Accessibility

Font Size

100% 150% 200%

Background Colour

Default Contrast
Close Reset

West Burra Firth

Broch (Iron Age), Cairn (Prehistoric)(Possible), Causeway (Prehistoric)

Site Name West Burra Firth

Classification Broch (Iron Age), Cairn (Prehistoric)(Possible), Causeway (Prehistoric)

Canmore ID 371

Site Number HU25NE 4

NGR HU 25621 57207

Datum OSGB36 - NGR

Permalink http://canmore.org.uk/site/371

Ordnance Survey licence number AC0000807262. All rights reserved.
Canmore Disclaimer. © Copyright and database right 2024.

Toggle Aerial | View on large map

Digital Images

Administrative Areas

  • Council Shetland Islands
  • Parish Sandsting
  • Former Region Shetland Islands Area
  • Former District Shetland
  • Former County Shetland

Archaeology Notes

HU25NE 4 2562 5720

(HU 2562 5722) Brough (OE)

(HU 2570 5719) Cuml (OE)

OS 6" map, Shetland, 2nd ed., (1903).

A broch which MacKie dates to the very early 1st century AD (MacKie 1965a) and a cairn on neighbouring island which the OS connects by a causeway, no signs of which are now visible. According to Spence the broch was 'connected with the land by a bridge of large stepping-stones over which the sea flows at full tide.'(Spence 1899) The site is now inaccessible without a boat except at very low tide. Much of the ground plan of the broch can still be made out, but many details are obscured by fallen material. Although the outer face has collapsed on the N.E. and the south, it still stands eight or nine courses high elsewhere. The overall diameter is 58' and the walls average 15' in thickness. The cairn is greatly dilapidated. The RCAHMS express extreme doubt as to the connection between the broch and the cairn.

RCAHMS 1946

The islands are connected 'by a stone causeway erected over a series of conduits'.

Name Book 1878.

A broch as described and illustrated by the RCAHM, accessible at low water by a well-built causeway. There is no trace of a cairn on the islet some 70.0m ESE of the broch. The islet is greatly eroded down to bed rock and only a little vegetation remains on its summit. An unlikely situation for a cairn.

Broch surveyed at 1/2500.

Visited by OS (N K B), 13 June 1968.

Activities

Measured Survey (17 June 1931)

RCAHMS surveyed the broch at West Burra Firth on 17 June 1931 by plane-table and alidade. The plan was redrawn in ink and published at a reduced size (RCAHMS 1946, fig. 618).

Field Visit (17 June 1931)

Broch, West Burra Firth.

This broch (Fig. 498) is situated near the head of West Burra Firth on a low, rocky islet, known as the Holm of Hebrista, which is said to have been formerly "connected with the land by a bridge of large stepping-stones over which the sea flows at full tide" (1). No clear indications of such a causeway are now to be seen, and except at very low tide the broch is inaccessible without a boat. Much of its ground-plan can still be made out, but many of the details are greatly obscured by fallen material. The over-all diameter is 58 ft., and the wall averages 15 ft.in thickness. Although the outer face has collapsed on the S. and on the N.E., it still stands eight or nine courses high elsewhere. The entrance faces the Firth and is approached through a cleft in the rocks, the mouth of which is at the end of a little cove. The doorway and entrance-passage, with their surroundings, are completely blocked, but it is evident that there has been the usual "guard-chamber" to right and to left. It will be observed from the plan that there have been four other cells or chambers within the thickness of the wall, and that, while two of these are of the usual oval form, two are shaped somewhat like dumb-bells. One of the latter is reached by a short entrance passage, but the passage to the other is longer and turns at an angle, resembling in these respects the passage leading to one of the oval cells. What happened in the fourth case is doubtful. Just above the mass of debris, which fills the interior, there is a scarcement varying in width from 9 to 11 in. and running at the same level as the solitary lintel-stone of the entrance-passage which remains in position. Above it the wall has a slight inward batter. Over the main entrance and the entrances to the cells are openings, each closed above by a lintel, doubtless the lower members of vertical series of similar openings such as are often found in brochs. The upper members of the series have, of course, disappeared along with the galleries and the staircase.

Many relics are said to have been found here from time to time. Whether there was any connection between the broch and the so-called "cuml" (No. 1413 [HU 2569 5718]) on the adjacent and still smaller islet is extremely doubtful.

RCAHMS 1946, visited 17 June 1931.

(1) Spence, Shetland Folk-Lore, p. 54.

OS 6" map, Shetland, 2nd ed., (1903).

Field Visit (16 June 1931)

Cairn, West Burra Firth.

This construction is on a tiny island a little to the E. of the broch of West Burra Firth (RCAHMS 1946, No. 1393). According to the O.S. map the two sites were connected by a causeway, no signs of which are now visible. The remains are greatly dilapidated.

RCAHMS 1946, visited 16 June 1931.

O.S.6"map, Shetland, (1903).

Publication Account (2002)

HU25 9 WEST BURRA FIRTH ('Burgh of Burrafirth' or ‘Holm of Hebrista’)

HU/256572 (visited 1/7/87)

Probable aberrant ground-galleried broch of unusual form in Sandsting, Mainland, standing on a low rocky islet firth (the Holm of Hebrista) in the Firth (Ills. 4.15-20). According to Spence there was once a causeway from the islet to the shore; although not seen by the Commission's investigators [2] it was apparent at low water in 1969 [1]. The site is an interesting one in that in its structure and situation it strongly resembles an island broch in the Outer Hebrides, even to the extent of having the ledge type scarcement which is rare in Shetland but almost universal in the west. The local stone also splits into massive polygonal blocks, like the gneisses of the Outer Hebrides.

George Low visited the site "'on a small holm in Helinster Voe ..... called the Burgh of Burrafirth." He described a number of cells in the base of the wall (the diagram showing the impossible number of eleven) 'to be entered from within' (i.e. from the court) and clearly stated that the hollow, galleried wall began above these. Moreover the description could imply that there was more than one gallery preserved at that time, namely "the double wall with galleries began above these" (the cells) "and was continued to the top". The cross section suggests a wall height of about 15 ft. just over two centuries ago (Ill. 4.143).

In spite of much fallen debris a number of structural features were made out, although there is no sign now of the upper gallery mentioned by Low. The entrance is blocked with stones but the lintel over the inner end is apparent (Ill. 4.16, above the theodolite), at the level of a scarcement 9-11 ins. wide which runs all round the interior at an unknown height above the floor (Ill. 4.17). Voids are visible over the main entrance, and over the doorways to four mural cells (Ill. 4.18); these should have led to an upper gallery.

These cells are of unusual construction, two being dumb-bell shaped with short passages between the two halves. Another seems to be an elongated cell reached by a short length of gallery from a doorway (see HU15 1 above) and one of the dumb-bells is similarly reached by a length of gallery into one end from a doorway as well as through a second doorway at its centre point (Ill. 4.20). A fourth mural cell seems to be circular and its entrance is not visible. There appear to be two cells on either side of the entrance passage, almost certainly guard cells (Ill. 4.19).

Dimensions. External diameter 58 ft. and wall thickness about 15 ft.: the walls proportion is therefore about 51.7%. In 1987 a fresh survey of the central court (below scarcement level) was made by the author which revealed that in plan it was close to a true circle with a radius of 4.10 +/- 0.08 m; the diameter is thus close to 8.20 m (26.89 ft.).

Sources: 1. OS card HU 25 NE 4 (with sketch plan): 2. RCAHMS 1946, vol. 3, no.1393, 100 and fig. 618: 3. Spence 1899, 54; 4. Low 1774 126-27; 5. Anderson 1890, 181.

E W MacKie 2002

References

MyCanmore Image Contributions


Contribute an Image

MyCanmore Text Contributions