Leckie

© Copyright and database right 2014. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 100020548.

Site Type BROCH, PROMONTORY FORT
Canmore ID 45379
Site Number NS69SE 12
NGR NS 6926 9399
Council STIRLING
Parish GARGUNNOCK
Former Region CENTRAL
Former District STIRLING
Former County STIRLINGSHIRE
Datum OSGB36 - NGR

Canmore Mapping
View this site on a map

C14 Radiocarbon Dating
C14 radiocarbon dating

Notes and Activities

Archaeological Notes

NS69SE 12 6926 9399.

NS 693 940. Situated on a prominent nose of land between the steep-sided gullies of two small streams are the remains of a broch, measuring c.21.0m NW-SE by 20.0m.
Excavation has revealed that there were two constructional phases to the site, both constructions apparently having been built, used, burnt out, and dismantled within a limited period, probably the 1st and 2nd centuries AD.
The first phase, on the N half of the site, seems to have been a solid-based broch, the foundations of which, including the mural stair, are quite well preserved. The second, built on the S half of the site after the destruction of the first, was a simple curved wall crossing the promontory. At the base of the outer wall face on the NE, a large piece of outcrop rock has at least eight typical cup marks.
The broch deposit contained one fragment of late 1st century, and several pieces of 2nd century Roman samian ware and some pieces of Roman glass. The promontory fort produced fewer finds, but iron hub-rings and bronze fittings from a vehicle came from its latest occupation stratum. There was a complete absence of native pottery from the site. Radiocarbon dates indicate that the broch was destroyed about AD 45 +/- 120 and the promontory fort, about AD 110 +/- 150.
E W MacKie 1973.

NS 6926 9399. This site is as described by previous authorities and is still in the course of excavation. Most of the circumference is still visible as is the mural stair. In the NW the wall measures 6.0m thick and it is doubtless therefore a broch. The suggestion that this first phase was replaced by a promontory fort is, however, difficult to follow since most of the useable space to the N would be occupied by the broch. Furthermore, there seems to be no real remains of the so-called curving wall which if it were later would surely have been of some strength and should have survived in the same way that the broch has.
Surveyed at 1:10,000.
Visited by OS (J P) 26 November 1975.

NS 692 939 Excavation has shown that a fort succeeded a broch on this steep-sided promontory. Finds from the site, which have been deposited in the Hunterian Museum, and C.14 dating, indicate a limited life span for both fortifications in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. An outcrop of rock at the N end of the promontory is cup-marked.
RCAHMS 1979, visited July 1978

 
Books and References

Armit, I (2003) Towers in the North: the Brochs of Scotland, London
Page(s): 119-25, 129, 130-1, 133 Held at RCAHMS E.9.1.ARM

Breeze, D J (1980b) 'Roman Scotland during the reign of Antoninus Pius', in Hanson, W S and Keppie, L J F Roman Frontier studies 1979: Papers presented to the 12th International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies Brit Archaeol Rep, International, vol.S71, 1 Oxford
Page(s): 46-7

Breeze, D J (1982a) The northern frontiers of Roman Britain, London
Page(s): 140, 144 Held at RCAHMS E.10.BRE

Showing 3 from 22 ...show more
Charity SC026749